Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Great American Management & Investment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1982No. 64618PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from an order dismissing appellants’ complaint as a sanction for failing to answer interrogatories. The dismissal was entered pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-137 (b) (2) (C) (OCGA § 9-11-37 (b)(2) (C)). The trial court had already issued an order compelling appellants to supplement previous answers to interrogatories. When no supplementation was filed, the trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss.

Appellants’ first enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal without first conducting a hearing. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swindell v. SwindellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schrembs v. Atlanta Classic Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Serwitz v. General Electric Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Smith v. Nat. Bank of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Vining v. KIMOTO USA, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Harwood v. Great American Management & Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API