Legal Opinion
Boulet v. Brunswick Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1983No. Docket 61773PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtV. J. Brennan, J.
The facts are set forth in the dissenting opinion. The sole issue for our consideration is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants Lawrence Kaye and Mel Anderson’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that they were immune from suit because of governmental immunity. MCL 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107).
We find no error on the part of the trial court. A public school in the operation of its athletic program, including the administration and supervision of a football program, is entitled to governmental immunity. Churilla v East Detroit School Dist, 105 Mich App 32; 306 NW2d 381…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parker v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Churilla v. School District for East DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Grames v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Regulski v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartzell v. ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- McGhee v. BhamaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Boulet v. Brunswick Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Davis v. Homestead Farms, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hartzell v. ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984