Legal Opinion

Charles E. Duffy, F-2268 v. Julius T. Cuyler and District Attorney, Philadelphia County

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 12, 1978No. 77-2099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from denial of habeas corpus relief questions whether in a nonjury criminal proceeding the defendant was afforded adequate constitutional protection in entering what was labeled a nolo contendere plea. Recent cases delineate what is encompassed in a true nolo plea, and suggest that the same standards apply in entering it as in the case of a guilty plea. But because of the unusual circumstances of the case sub judice, we hold that the defendant’s conviction was not vitiated by lack of advice on the record of the maximum sentence to which he…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. KulpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles E. Duffy, F-2268 v. Julius T. Cuyler and District Attorney, Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API