Legal Opinion

Eleazer F. Backus, in Error v. William Gould and David Banks, Who Sue as Well for the United States as Themselves

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1849PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

48 U.S. 798

7 How. 798

12 L.Ed. 919

ELEAZER F. BACKUS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

WILLIAM GOULD AND DAVID BANKS, WHO SUE AS WELL FOR

THE UNITED STATES AS THEMSELVES.

January Term, 1849

1

THIS case was brought, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

2

It was a qui tam action, brought by Gould and Banks against Backus, for an alleged invasion of their copyright in nine volumes of Cowen's Reports, and the first three volumes of Wendell's Reports.

3

On the trial, the affidavit of John L. Wendell was read, stating that he, the deponent, was the real…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · McLEAN.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Backus v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bolles v. Outing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Bolles v. Outing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  4. Weil v. CalhounU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1885
  5. Morrison v. PettiboneU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API