Legal Opinion

Smith v. C. I. T. Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1943No. 30076Published

1OpinionSutton, J.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance, and in the main agree to what is said in the majority opinion; but under the facts and circumstances of the present case I think the following may appropriately be said: The present suit is based on the alleged malicious use of legal process in the institution of a bailtrover action for the recovery of a certain automobile. “Malicious use of legal process is where a plaintiff in a civil proceeding em ploys the court’s process in order to execute' the object which the law intends for such a process to subserve, but proceeds maliciously and without…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Porter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Hartshorn v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. McElreath v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Woodley v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Wilcox v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API