Legal Opinion

ALLEN v. DAKER (And Vice Versa)

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 2021No. S21A0091, S21X0092PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

311 Ga. 485

FINAL COPY S21A0091, S21X0092. ALLEN v. DAKER; and vice versa. NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. At a jury trial in 2012, Waseem Daker was found guilty of malice murder and other crimes. Daker had hired or was appointed four attorneys, all of whom were allowed to withdraw before or near the beginning of the trial; he ultimately elected to expressly waive his right to counsel so that he could represent himself (commonly referred to as proceeding “pro se”) during the trial. After Daker was convicted, however, he repeatedly asked for appellate counsel to be appointed to represent him, but…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Jones v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. ZehSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  2. Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  3. State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  4. Adrian Arroyo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  5. Antonio Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API