Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. of America v. Lyman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1903No. Nos. 13,519—(174)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Henne-pin county in favor of defendant, entered pursuant to an order of Elliott, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLovblx, J.

Action on a promissory note, from which defendant had been relieved by a discharge in bankruptcy. Subsequent thereto it is claimed a new promise revived the original obligation. The cause was tried to the court, who made findings and ordered judgment for the defendant, which was entered. Plaintiff appeals.

Upon this review we are required to adopt the conclusion of the trial court that defendant became legally indebted to plaintiff upon a promissory note, but was relieved therefrom by a valid discharge in bankruptcy. After such discharge the authorized representative of the owner of the note…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StanchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holden v. ChamberlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pearsall v. TabourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API