Legal Opinion

Smith v. Jackson County

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 15, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

As stated in the Per Curiam Order in this case, the writ of error is to an order granting a new trial upon failure of the plaintiff to enter within ten days a remittitur in the sum of $1,250.00 on a verdict of $2,500.00.

I think the trial court abused judicial discretion in requiring a remittitur for $1,250.00 under the evidence in this case. The rule applicable to the case is stated in The Elks Club of Tampa v. Adair, 95 Fla. 415, 116 So. 26, where we held:

“A careful consideration of the record (which is unnecessarily voluminous, because the testimony appears not in narrative form but in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Florida Railway & Navigation Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  4. De La Vallina v. De La VallinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Tucker v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WylieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Florida Power Corporation v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Bishop v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Bobenhausen v. Cassat Ave. Mobile Homes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Price v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API