Legal Opinion
Alonzo v. Dexcom Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 14, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01485Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 24-cv-1485-RSH-VET IN RE: DEXCOM, INC. CLASS 12 ACTION SECURITIES LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 MOTION TO DISMISS LEAD PLAINTIFF’S CONSOLIDATED 14 COMPLAINT 15 [ECF No. 29] 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss, filed by defendants Dexcom Inc. 20 (“Dexcom”), Kevin Sayer (“Sayer”), Jereme Sylvain (“Sylvain”), and Teri Lawver 21 (“Lawver”). ECF No. 29. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion 22 presented appropriate for resolution without oral…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knappenberger v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- National Elevator Industry Pension Fund v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Glazer Capital Management, L.p v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.