Legal Opinion
United States v. Olmeda
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 22, 2018No. Docket No. 15-3449; August Term, 2017PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant-Appellant, Antonio Olmeda, who was convicted of multiple firearm offenses, appeals his 151-month sentence. He argues that the district court (Berman, J. ) erred by not ordering that his federal sentence run concurrent to any sentence that ensued from then-pending state charges. In support, Olmeda cites U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c) of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which instructs that a federal sentence "shall be imposed to run concurrently" to "a state term of imprisonment [that] is anticipated to result from another offense that is relevant conduct to the instant offense of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. JassCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rene Ramirez GomezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Elizabeth Sarah Hagan v. Flowers, Warden, FSL DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- United States v. Brandon DeJuan WardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Gary Giovon LynnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.