MacCio v. Hundley
Connecticut Superior Court
1Per curiam
We have previously ordered a dismissal of the appeal which was taken from the judgment of possession rendered in favor of the plaintiff lessors in this case, because it was filed after the expiration of the five days allowed for an appeal by the summary process statute. General Statutes § 47a-35; Maccio v. Hundley, 36 Conn. Snp. 623, 422 A.2d 953 (1980). At the same time, we refused to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from the denial of his motion to open the judgment, which we held was not governed by the time limit set forth in § 47a-35 but by the limit established by Practice Book, 1978, §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Manchester State Bank v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Jacobson v. RobingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Bellonio v. v. R. Thomas Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- MacCio v. HundleyConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- ADC Contracting & Supply Corporation v. Thomas J. Riordan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.