Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tune v. Blaney

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1984No. Docket No. 64481Published

1DissentShepherd, J.

I dissent since I believe that the statute permitting the admission of the results of the HLA blood test applies retroactively; because I do not believe plaintiffs counsel waived the admissibility of the results of the test under the circumstances of this case; and because I believe that the ruling by the trial court regarding the defendant’s refusal to answer interrogatories was incorrect.

I. Retroactivity of Amendments to MCL 722.716; MSA 25.496

Were it not for the procedural nature of the issues in this case, there would be little question as to the results on appeal. There was substantial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bannan v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API