Halberstam v. Cokeley
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
David and Jean Halberstam (Halberstams) appeal from a default judgment. The Hal-berstams challenge the propriety of the entry of default and the subsequent determination by the district court that a damages hearing was unnecessary because the damages were liquidated.
We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The Halberstams raise the following issues:
1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in granting default judgment without a hearing on damages?
2. Did the court abuse its discretion in denying the motion to set aside entry of default and default judgment?
FACTS
On October 1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- The Independent Oil and Chemical Workers of Quincy, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Amernational Industries, Inc. v. Action-Tungsram, Inc., ElectroexportimportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Spitzer v. SpitzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Multiple Resort Ownership Plan, Inc. v. Design-Build-Manage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Houston v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Whitney v. McDonoughWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re ZmetsWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Blittersdorf v. EikenberryWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.