Tomayo v. Murray
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Defendant was entitled to dismissal as matter of law at the end of the entire case. A space, necessary for the operation of the railroad, of ten and three-quarters inches between car and station platforms at a curve in the tracks of the subway at Lenox avenue and One Hundred and Tenth street, is not of itself evidence of negligence. There being no crowding or inadequate light, the evidence showing illumination at the space by hanging lights underneath the platform, defendant railroad was under no duty to maintain a guard to warn passengers. Plaintiff’s admission that on many previous…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Yarde v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Pemberton v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Glover v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Johnson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005