Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Sheer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 20, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*512The opinion of the court was delivered by
Minturn, J.
The parties to this action contracted as follows:
“September 1, 1920, Freehold, FT. J.
I, the undersigned, received $1,000 on amount of iron as laying in your yard, Manetta avenue, Lakewood, FT. J., at the price of 75 cents per hundred pounds in the yard. The stock can be removed at any time to suit the buyer, J. Weinstein, Freehold, FT. J.
Max Sheer, by M. Bernard, Atty.”
The quantity of iron involved approximated one hundred and ten tons, and the plaintiff after paying for the same in full, and relying upon the letter of the contract,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Drew v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- Nipp v. DiskeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beach Resort Hotel Corporation v. WiederSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Matter of National Molding Company, Bankrupt, Patco Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Harry C. Partridge, Jr. & Sons, Inc. v. M & R Construction Corp. (In Re Harry C. Partridge, Jr. & Sons, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Banks v. Korman AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.