Legal Opinion
Oliver Preiss v. Roy Horn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2013No. 11-17377UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Oliver and Beatrice Preiss appeal the district court’s order imposing sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 on their counsel in their Title VII employment discrimination action against S & R Production Co. (“S & R”) and Roy Horn. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys have standing to appeal the order of sanctions against them. These attorneys have made their intent to appeal the sanctions order clear by preparing, signing, and filing the notice of appeal, which lists them as the attorneys for Plaintiffs. See Detabali v. St. Luke’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- David B. Lowry v. Jo Anne Barnhart, in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Dan Hyatt Riley Atkins Bennett EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sparta Surgical Corp. v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Lorraine Detabali v. St. Luke's Hospital John Williams Philip Gardner Christine Green Evangeline Mondares Susan McCorquodale Rose ReneeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Macedo v. Dolgen California, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Matter of MeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018