Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 17, 1994No. 93 CR 20050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REINHARD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Daphne E. Bell, was indicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 A & D and 18 U.S.C. § 924(k) arising out of an armed bank robbery. The government filed before Magistrate Judge P. Michael Mahoney a motion for a court-ordered mental examination of defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2(c) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 4241 and 4242. The magistrate judge issued a memorandum opinion and order denying the government’s motion. The government filed with this court an objection to the magistrate judge’s order and a motion in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Algienon TannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v. Ronald Clifton Cooley, United States of America v. Ralph WalkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MarenghiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
  2. Wonnum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
  4. Wonnum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API