Legal Opinion · Dissent

Larson v. Callahan Canning Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1933No. 6027Published

1Dissent

MORGAN, J.,

Dissenting. — The decision in the foregoing opinion is based on the theory that there is a conflict in the evidence and on I. C. A., sec. 43-1408, therein quoted. The portion of that section which attempts to limit courts to a review of questions of law violates Idaho Constitution, art. 1, sec. 18, art. 2, and art. 5, sec. 13, and, if the legislature in enacting the Workmen’s Compensation Law attempted to create a court, it also violates art. 5, see. 2. These sections are as follows:

Art. 1, sec. 18: “Courts of justice shall be open to every person, and a speedy remedy afforded for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Stein v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hunter v. N. Y., Ontario & Western R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. In Re EdwardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Toncray v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API