S.F. Pioneer Woolen Factory v. Brickwedel
California Supreme Court
Application for writ of mandamus..
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
The petitioner alleges that on the first day of June, 1880, the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, passed an ordinance known as “Order Mo. 1,573— Establishing Water Bates,” to take effect on the first day of July thereafter, and that by section 11 of said ordinance it is provided that “ The rates of compensation to be collected for water supplied to the City and County of San Francisco for municipal purposes, shall be as follows:
“Fifteen ($15) dollars per month for each and every hydrant for fire purposes and for flushing sewers. Five hundred ($500)…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Knight v. BD. ETC. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENTCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Century Cab Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Dallas Power & Light Co. v. CarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Bothwell v. Consumers' Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- City of El Paso v. El Paso City Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.