Legal Opinion

Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 19, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint violates the provisions of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act in failing to contain a plain and concise statement of the material facts. Instead it contains a detailed recital of the evidentiary facts upon which, presumably, plaintiff intends to rely. Moreover, the complaint in alleging in its twenty-third paragraph that plaintiff denies liability under its policy upon grounds, “ among others ”, that defendant Paul Hodgkinson was not a resident of the household of the named insured fails to tender an issue which would be determinative of the liabilities between the parties.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API