Legal Opinion

Appeal of Cahill

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1903No. 145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Per curiam

According to the testimony of Brainard, the pilot of the tug, he thought the dredge was going to founder, and told Cutter, the master, that he thought the best thing to be done was to “take the men off and let the dredge go on the beach”; and this was before the alleged waving of lights on board the dredge. Cutter, the master of the tug, testifies that he ordered the tug hawser cut solely because of signals from the dredge, and would not otherwise have done so. No signals had been given from the dredge, and we are satisfied the master of the tug ordered the hawser cut, not because of any…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. Sternberg Dredging Co. v. Moran Towing & Transp. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Henry Du Bois Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Maryland Transp. Co. v. DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  5. The Joseph F. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API