Legal Opinion

Roe v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1911No. 9223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered June 8, 1910, confirming an assessment roll for a local improvement, after a hearing before the court on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court of King county, confirming an assessment roll in an assessment district for street improvement purposes. The city of Seattle, by ordinance, provided for widening Jackson street in said city, from Fourth avenue to Fourteenth avenue south, to a width of ninety-six feet, by appropriating fifteen feet of land on each side of the street. Proceedings in condemnation were had, and judgments were entered in favor of the various property owners for land taken, and thereafter the matter was referred to the board of eminent domain commissioners of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Westlake AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Seattle v. Meteor Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In re Condemnation Proceedings by City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. City of Seattle v. Seattle & Montana RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Spokane v. FonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Spokane v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re Boyer AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Commissioners Commercial Waterway District No. 2 v. Seattle Factory Sites Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API