Legal Opinion
Koffsky v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1998No. 96 CV 2343 ADSPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Lisa J. Koffsky (“Koffsky” or the “plaintiff’), commenced this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of a final administrative determination of the defendant, Kenneth S. Apfel, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”), denying her application for social security disability insurance benefits. The plaintiff challenges the Commissioner’s finding that the plaintiff was not “insured” within the meaning of the Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1)(A)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wider v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Ingrassia v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Dimartino v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Byrne v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Benitez v. Comissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.