Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Lahn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 14, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eastwood, C. C. J.

The application for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted in the above causes (consolidated for trial) arises out of verdicts in favor of all of the plaintiffs against the defendant Frank Kosello, at the Cumberland County Circuit. Parenthetically, it may *338be stated that in so far as the plaintiffs Ocie Gilbert and Ruby Boothe are concerned, this was the second trial of the cause on all issues. At the previous trial the jury found a verdict in favor of these plaintiffs and against all of the defendants. It was the first trial for the plaintiff Francis…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimble v. DegenringSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. Floersch v. DonnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Rubel v. WeissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  4. Drotar v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Rafferty v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Justice v. WeiseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API