Legal Opinion

Regan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 10, 1917No. Gen. No. 6,320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the City Court of Elgin; the Hon. Fbank E. Shopen, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

In January and February, 1916, there was pending-in the City Court of Elgin a suit wherein Martin J. Regan was plaintiff and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company was defendant, and in which Henry R. Rathbone had appeared as attorney for plaintiff. On a motion by plaintiff made on January 22nd and granted on February 5th, Paul F. Compart was substituted as attorney for plaintiff in place of Rathbone. On February 26th, by leave of court, plaintiff filed a petition in said cause, in which he stated that his cause of action stated in the declaration was by him placed in the hands of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sammis v. PooleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Sammis v. PooleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savich v. SavichIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pressney v. PressneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  3. De Korwin v. First National Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957
  4. Clark v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API