Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Hovis v. Ashe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1950No. Appeal, No. 28PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

We granted an allocatur in this case in order that the issue of fact as to whether the relator was arbitrarily refused counsel at trial, which the petitioner averred and the district attorney denied, might be definitely re*82solved. We now have the detailed recollection of the learned trial judge before whom the relator entered his plea óf guilty to the indictments whereon he is now under sentence. The trial judge states that not only did he not refuse the relator counsel at trial but, on the contrary, that he advised him of his right to be represented by counsel and offered to…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Popovich v. ClaudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Uhler v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Reese v. ClaudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sawchak v. AsheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Reggie v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API