Legal Opinion
Barnett Bank of St. Lucie County v. Garrett
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 8, 1985No. Nos. 84-1429, 84-1493PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant correctly asserts that the trial judge erred when he entered an order granting appellee’s motion for leave to file a counterclaim, simultaneously with his order of recusal. See Weiner v. Weiner, 416 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order dated June 28, 1984 which granted appel-lee’s motion for leave to file a counterclaim.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weiner v. WeinerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stimpson Computing Scale Co. v. KnuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Barnett Bank of South Florida, NA v. TarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Lance Block, P.A. v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012