Cannon v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1DissentHolland, Justice
We agree with the holding by the majority that DelDOT has the statutory authority to condemn land for wetlands mitigation if that action is reasonably necessary for *564the purpose of maintaining State highways. The record reflects that DelDOT’s condemnation of the Cannons’ additional property for wetlands mitigation was unnecessary and unreasonable. Accordingly, we respectfully dissent.
Eminent Domain
The power of eminent domain is an inherent aspect of sovereign authority. It is the “power to compel a transfer of property from a private owner to the government for a public purpose.”5 The power of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Atlantis I Condominium Ass'n v. BrysonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Wilmington Parking Authority v. Land With Improvements, Situate in WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.