Chambers v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Confronting us for determination in a workmen’s conpensation case is the right of the superior court judge to remand the matter to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for the purpose of taking additional evidence on whether an employer had the required number of 10 or more employees regularly in service and whether a named individual should be added as a party defendant to the employer-partnership as requested in a motion that was made at the initial hearing but without any decision thereon. Pointing to the necessity of having finality in legal proceedings, appellant contends the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Zurich Insurance Company v. McDuffieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Beachamp v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Georgia Power Company v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- US CASUALTY COMPANY v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Security Insurance Group v. BrackettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985