Legal Opinion

Brown Shoe Co. v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 28, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. John F. Oliver,, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Kinne O. J.

I. This cause was determined upon the following agreed statement of facts: “This is an action in replevin, in which the Brown Shoe Company, ,a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, is plaintiff, and Frank Hunt, of Sioux City, Iowa, is defendant. That immediately prior to and within the last two years before the commencement of this action, the defendant was the agent and general manager of and for Lola M. Hunt, the proprietor of the New Oxford Hotel, in Sioux City, Iowa. That said hotel was kept for the general accommodation of the general traveling public.…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hodge v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. State v. WynneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. RopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Hodge v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Cedar Rapids Investment Co. v. Commodore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API