Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. City of Anchorage

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided October 8, 1951No. A-6820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to recover approximately $250,000 in damages under a contract to pave streets and sidewalks and provide for the drainage thereof, for the failure of the defendant to make payments whén due, delay in preparing and vacating stre.ets for paving, failure to perform, and incompetency in the performance of, preliminary engineering services, failuré to furnish certain materials, requiring plaintiff to depart from specifications and repudiating a waiver of certain specifications respecting plaintiff’s paving plant.

Neither of the parties has filed or submitted a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Musteen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Kraus v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. Woods v. ParsonsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
  4. Kincaid v. City of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krueger v. PetrakDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API