Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice Marshall,
with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Powell join, dissenting.*
The Court today recognizes that “in its private civil version, RICO is evolving into something quite different from *501the original conception of its enactors.” Ante, at 500. The Court, however, expressly validates this result, imputing it to the manner in which the statute was drafted. I fundamentally disagree both with the Court’s reading of the statute and with its conclusion. I believe that the statutory language and history disclose a narrower interpretation of the statute that fully…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.