Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 1, 1985No. 84-648Published

1Dissent

Justice Marshall,

with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Powell join, dissenting.*

The Court today recognizes that “in its private civil version, RICO is evolving into something quite different from *501the original conception of its enactors.” Ante, at 500. The Court, however, expressly validates this result, imputing it to the manner in which the statute was drafted. I fundamentally disagree both with the Court’s reading of the statute and with its conclusion. I believe that the statutory language and history disclose a narrower interpretation of the statute that fully…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API