Legal Opinion

Brooks-Harbour & Associates, Inc. v. Mustakas

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1990No. 89-CA-2019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KLEES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment against defendant requiring him to pay a sum due on an open account for professional services rendered by plaintiff. We reverse and remand.

Defendant, George T. Mustakas, II, was counsel for the plaintiff in an action entitled “Alfred Lee Wright, Jr. v. U.S. Gypsum et al.” During the course of discovery in that action, Mr. Mustakas took the deposition of one of the defendant’s experts, F.M. Brooks, P.E., plaintiff in the instant action. On March 25, 1987, plaintiff submitted a bill to Mr. Mustakas in the amount of $611.70. The amount remained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MINE & SMELTER, ETC. v. Ceres Gulf, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity and Cas. Co. v. A&M CONS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API