Brooks-Harbour & Associates, Inc. v. Mustakas
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KLEES, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendant requiring him to pay a sum due on an open account for professional services rendered by plaintiff. We reverse and remand.
Defendant, George T. Mustakas, II, was counsel for the plaintiff in an action entitled “Alfred Lee Wright, Jr. v. U.S. Gypsum et al.” During the course of discovery in that action, Mr. Mustakas took the deposition of one of the defendant’s experts, F.M. Brooks, P.E., plaintiff in the instant action. On March 25, 1987, plaintiff submitted a bill to Mr. Mustakas in the amount of $611.70. The amount remained…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MINE & SMELTER, ETC. v. Ceres Gulf, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fidelity and Cas. Co. v. A&M CONS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997