Koplin v. Saul Lerner Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
Summons upon the three defendants in this case was served personally in New York under sections 16 and 17 of the Civil Practice Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap, no, pars. 16, 17.) The motions of two of the defendants to quash the service of process were granted, and the plaintiff has appealed directly to this court on the ground that the validity of a statute or a construction of the constitution is involved. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap, no, par. 75.) For reasons that will be stated we are of the opinion that this court lacks jurisdiction upon direct appeal.
The two defendants are Saul Lerner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Grobark v. Addo MacHine Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- The People v. NastasioIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Shilvock v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Watseka v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koplin v. Saul Lerner Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Thompson v. Board of Commissioners of Oak Brook Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971