Legal Opinion

McLean, Koehler, Sparks & Hammond v. Schnepfe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 22, 1987No. 102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This appeal in general involves the problem of unfunded retirement benefits. In particular it involves the interpretation of the terms, “any unpaid or accrued expenses,” as used in the voluntary withdrawal provisions of a partnership agreement between certified public accountants. The parties disagree over the applicability of the quoted terms to unfunded obligations to pay, monthly, determinable amounts to retired former partners for ten years after retirement. The trial court, sitting nonjury, concluded that those obligations to retired partners were not “expenses” under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Dryden v. Baltimore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Clark v. SeidelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dumbarton Improvement Ass'n v. Druid Ridge Cemetery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Keller North America, Inc. v. Berkel & Company Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API