Legal Opinion

Jehan Mir v. Kenneth Deck

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2017No. 13-56747UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jehan Zeb Mir, M.D., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), and state law claims in connection with the termination of his California license to practice medicine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004) (statute of limitations); Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2004) (immunity determination). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed as time-barred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Douglas v. NoelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Wasco Products, Inc. v. Southwall Technologies, Inc. Bostik, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Pincay v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (PS) Rhee v. AlvarezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. Bonner v. Medical Board of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Bonner v. Medical Board of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. MIR v. BRODDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API