Legal Opinion

In re Penny

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

This cause coming on review from Hon. Kenneth Brim, upon the exceptions filed, and the matter having been argued by counsel and after due consideration, the court finds the following facts:

1. All facts set forth in the stipulation and the schedules and claims proved before the referee in bankruptcy.

2. Upon the foregoing facts the court also finds that the receiver is holding the property of George Trade Penny as his agent and not for the purpose of enforcing any lien on said property.

Conclusions of Law.

The court is of the opinion, and so holds, that the title to the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API