Legal Opinion
Christopher v. Hoger & Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided July 6, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
During the year 1935 defendant sold and delivered to plaintiff’s assignor flour and corn meal covered by certain invoices. It is claimed that the price of the merchandise shown on each invoice included a tax collected by defendant under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (U. S. Code, tit. 7, § 609). That act having been declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court (United States of America v. Butler, 297 U. S. 1; 80 L. Ed. 287), plaintiff seeks recovery of the total tax which he says was added to the price of the invoiced merchandise.
Ordinarily, where the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Wayne County Produce Co. v. Duffy-Mott Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Moore v. . Des ArtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Friend v. RosenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Planters Nut & Chocolate Co. v. Brown-Murray Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Shannon v. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Continental Baking Co. v. Suckow Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Golding Bros. v. DumaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- Wilson Area School District v. SkeptonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.