Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2019No. Case No. 20160300PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Zane Charles Sanders cannot legally possess a firearm because the Utah Code prohibits any individual convicted of a felony from, among other things, "intentionally or knowingly" having a firearm in his possession. UTAH CODE § 76-10-503(1)(b), (3) (2014). A jury convicted Sanders of violating section 503 after police officers responding to a domestic complaint found Sanders in his backyard carrying a rifle.

¶ 2 Sanders claimed that when the police officers arrived at his home, he was moving his girlfriend's son's firearm back into the house.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Barrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Bagley v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HatfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Christiansen v. Harrison WesternUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Scott v. BensonUtah Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Zazetti v. Prestige Senior Living CenterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. Northern Monticello Alliance v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API