Greater Finance Company v. Harris
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to open a judgment taken by default. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we affirm the order of the court below.
[ 1] The cases are legion, the principles oft-cited, and the limitations of appellate inquiry well-defined. “Our review of the decision of the court below [on a petition to open a judgment by default] ... is guided by several well established principles, foremost of which is that ‘only when there has been an abuse of discretion by the court below in refusing to open a default judgment will this Court reverse . . . . ’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Wenger v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Garrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bollinger v. CressmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Greater Finance Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Greater Finance Company v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Nardulli v. John Carlo, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Nardulli v. John Carlo, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979