Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dominic B. Arguelles v. U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc., a Body Corporate

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1969No. 11640Published

1DissentHaynsworth, Chief Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent.

The claims pressed by Arguelles are almost totally dependent upon an interpretation and application of the collective bargaining agreement between his labor union and his employer. Arguelles invokes that agreement; he is bound by it, including its requirement of resort to its grievance and arbitration procedures for the settlement of contract disputes. The majority forgoes the obvious advantages of having such claims adjudicated within the framework of that agreement because it perceives that the special protection traditionally accorded seamen with respect to prompt…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API