Legal Opinion

State v. Mair

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 1956PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

39 N.J. Super. 18 (1956)

120 A.2d 487

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

WILLIAM H. MAIR AND THELMA C. MAIR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 6, 1956.

Decided February 10, 1956.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Irvine B. Johnstone, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Dughi & Johnstone, attorneys).

Mr. Robert S. Snevily argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendants were convicted in the Municipal Court of Westfield of having violated the local zoning…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wright v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Zahn v. Newark Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Keller v. WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Mahler v. Borough of Fair LawnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. SCHANTZ v. RachlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API