Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1983No. 82-046PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The plaintiff, Kirk C. Richardson, had been an officer of the police division of the Omaha Department of Public Safety. By letter dated May 22, 1981, from the acting chief of police, he was ordered suspended and dismissed from employment. Richardson prosecuted an appeal to the personnel board of the City of Omaha, and following a hearing that appeal was denied by a vote of 4 to O. An error proceeding was then prosecuted to the District Court of Douglas County, which affirmed the decision of the personnel board.

On appeal to this court the plaintiff assigns the following errors: (1) That the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Caniglia v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ostler v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. WilenNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. SchreckNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wadman v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hauser v. Nebraska Police Standards Advisory CouncilNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API