Dillingham v. Barron
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
Appeal from special term. Action by Thomas M. Dillingham against Clarence W. Barron. From an order permitting defendant’s attorneys to withdraw their appearance, plaintiff appeals. The moving affidavit is as follows: Edward S. Hatch, being duly sworn, says: I am an attorney at law, and a member of the firm of Hatch & Wickes.
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term. Action by Thomas M. Dillingham against Clarence W. Barron. From an order permitting defendant’s attorneys to withdraw their appearance, plaintiff appeals. The moving affidavit is as follows: Edward S. Hatch, being duly sworn, says: I am an attorney at law, and a member of the firm of Hatch & Wickes. On August 28, 1893, I caused to be served on F. J. Worcester, Esq., the attorney for the plaintiff herein, a general notice of appearance on behalf of the defendant; demanding that a copy of the complaint, and all other papers, be served upon me. A copy of the complaint…
1Per curiam
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Bailey v. CoventryNew York Supreme Court · 1927