Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1968No. 40778PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction of rape entered pursuant to a guilty plea.

The file in this case is virtually devoid of relevant facts. Accordingly, the facts here are taken from defendant’s brief. According to the state’s brief, his statement of facts is correct.

Defendant, Thomas Hamilton, was charged by indictment with having committed rape in violation of Minn. St. 617.01. The public defender of Ramsey County was appointed to represent him. Defendant entered a plea of not guilty on June 3, 1966. Pursuant to order, a psychiatric examination of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AdkisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API