Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1907No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Charles T. Stearns and Edgar F. Stearns, copartners as Stearns Brothers, against the Grand Trunk Railway Company for the amount of a sight draft attached to a bill of lading. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action to recover of defendant the amount of a sight draft on J. P. Scranton & Co. attached to the bill of lading of a car load of lumber consigned to plaintiffs’ order, and shipped by them over defendant railway, to be delivered to said Scranton & Co. upon payment of the draft. Defendant delivered the lumber to Scranton & Co. without payment of the draft, and defends this action upon the ground that Scranton & Co. were the true owners. The draft was for 1116.68, which *272was about half the value of the lumber in the car, and, according to plaintiff, represented the balance due on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winget v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Louisville & Atlantic R. R. v. Hiram Blow & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Stearns v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API