Legal Opinion

Herndon v. Wright

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1971No. 19302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to his second cause of action, whereby he seeks rescission, on the ground of mutual mistake, of a release executed by him following an automobile collision in which he sustained personal injuries. The complaint, in form, is divided into three causes of action. The first is for damages for personal injuries, and the third is for rescission of the release on the ground of fraud. It is probable that plaintiff has only one cause of action for recission of the release, and that the complaint merely states…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jumper v. Queen Mab Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  2. Spell v. TraxlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Franks v. ANTHONYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Glenn v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Lawton v. Charleston & Western Car. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Smith v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Ellett Brothers, Inc. v. ManosSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Bennett v. Shinoda Floral, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bennett v. Shinoda Floral, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API