State v. Garcia
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendants have appealed from their convictions of burglary and possession of burglary tools. They rely on two points for reversal.
Although the first point relates only to Defendant Garcia, both defendants apparently rely upon it. Defendant Garcia had taken the witness stand on his own behalf, and on cross-examination was asked if he had “* * * ever been convicted of any crime or misdemeanor.”
Defendants’ attorney objected to the question without stating the nature or grounds of his objection. He did state he was relying on State v. Rowell, 77 N.M. 124, 419 P.2d 966 (1966),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. SladeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. McFerranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. MelendrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.