Legal Opinion

Hack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 1991No. 90-1012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the order of probation imposed by the lower court and direct the court to hold a hearing on restitution on appellant’s motion. See A.P. v. State, 558 So.2d 519 (Fla.1990).

As in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COM*1232MITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

DAUKSCH, COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. A.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Banegas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991