Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rothko

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 27, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Millard L. Midonick, S.

The decision of this court in the removal proceeding with respect to this estate (84 Mise 2d 830) and the decree entered thereon provided that the grant of costs and disbursements to the prevailing parties be reserved for supplemental decree after the final determination of all appeals. That decree was affirmed with one modification by the Appellate Division (56 *494AD2d 499) and the Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed in all respects the order of the Appellate Division, with costs to the prevailing parties against the appellants (43 NY2d 305).

There is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of RothkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  4. Rowe v. GrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Hayman v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schoenholtz v. DonigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Birnbaum v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Estate of Reis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. In re the Estate of PausnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  5. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API